Who this is for
Women 65 and older: all three recommend a scan. USPSTF (2025) grades it B, with moderate certainty of moderate net benefit. ACOG makes it a strong recommendation on high-quality evidence. BHOF lists women 65 and older for testing regardless of clinical risk factors. No body on this page sets an age to stop.
Postmenopausal women under 65: a scan only at increased risk, on all three positions, though each judges risk its own way (see below). USPSTF suggests two steps: first check for risk factors, which it names as menopausal status, low body weight, parental history of hip fracture, cigarette smoking and excess alcohol consumption; then, for a woman with 1 or more besides being postmenopausal, use a clinical risk assessment tool to decide whether a scan is warranted. ACOG requires a formal, validated risk tool. BHOF recommends testing postmenopausal women 50 to 64 with risk factors, and its Table 6 also names women in the menopausal transition.
Men: here the bodies split. USPSTF (2025) issues an I statement, insufficient evidence, because "there are no studies on the benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis or fracture risk in men, and evidence on the benefits and harms of treatment is very limited." It says what the I does not mean: "The USPSTF wants to clarify that the I statement is not a recommendation against screening; it indicates that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms and is a call for more research." It leaves the decision to clinicians and patients together. BHOF (2022) recommends testing all men 70 and older regardless of risk factors, and men 50 to 69 with clinical risk factors for fracture. ACOG does not address men. USPSTF says men have fracture risk factors similar to women's, among them increasing age, low BMI, chronic corticosteroid use, a prior fracture and a fall within the past year.
Not covered by these rows: USPSTF's recommendations apply to adults 40 or older without known osteoporosis or a fragility fracture, and not to secondary osteoporosis from a medical condition or a medication such as glucocorticoids. BHOF recommends testing those groups on other grounds, including adults with a fracture at 50 or older and people taking glucocorticoids, aromatase inhibitors or androgen deprivation therapy. That is testing for a reason, not screening.
Where the recommendations diverge
- USPSTF 65 and older
- USPSTF Up to 64
- USPSTF Evidence insufficient
- ACOG 65 and older
- ACOG Up to 64
- ACOG Not age-bounded
- BHOF 65 and older
- BHOF 70 and older
- BHOF 50 to 64
- BHOF 50 to 69
The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in women 65 years or older.
Our note: Test, from the clinician summary: "Screen women 65 years or older with DXA BMD, with or without fracture risk assessment." Applies to adults 40 or older without known osteoporosis or a history of fragility fractures, and not to secondary osteoporosis from an underlying condition or chronic medication use such as glucocorticoids. On intervals, cohort studies suggest repeating BMD testing at 4 to 8 years adds no accuracy in predicting fractures. Updates the June 2018 statement; grades unchanged. No stop age is stated.
The USPSTF recommends screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women younger than 65 years who are at increased risk for an osteoporotic fracture as estimated by clinical risk assessment.
Our note: A 2-step approach: first the risk factors (menopausal status, low body weight, parental history of hip fracture, cigarette smoking, excess alcohol consumption), then, for a woman with 1 or more besides postmenopausal status, a clinical risk assessment tool. Table 2 examples: OST under 2 and ORAI 9 or higher as frequently used thresholds; FRAX has no specific threshold. The 8.4% FRAX cutoff ACOG attributes to the 2018 statement is not in this one. No start age is stated; at 65 the row above applies.
The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for osteoporosis to prevent osteoporotic fractures in men.
Our note: An I statement is not a no. USPSTF: "The USPSTF wants to clarify that the I statement is not a recommendation against screening; it indicates that the evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms and is a call for more research." Of the three screening trials, it found none that included men. Clinician summary: "Clinicians should use their clinical judgment regarding whether to screen for osteoporosis in men."
ACOG recommends screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal patients 65 years and older
Our note: An excerpt: the sentence continues that screening is by BMD testing, to prevent osteoporotic fractures. Grade as printed: "STRONG RECOMMENDATION, HIGH-QUALITY EVIDENCE". ACOG names DXA as the preferred test. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 1 is dated September 2021 with no day, so we record the first; its page shows "Reaffirmed 2025" with no month. Replaces Practice Bulletin 129 (2012). ACOG does not address men. No stop age is stated.
postmenopausal patients younger than 65 years who are at increased risk of osteoporosis
Our note: An excerpt: the sentence recommends BMD screening for this group, with risk set by a formal clinical risk assessment tool, and ACOG names FRAX among the tools. Same printed grade as the row above. Its text restates the 2018 USPSTF cutoff, a 10-year FRAX major osteoporotic fracture risk greater than 8.4%. The 2025 USPSTF statement sets no FRAX threshold, so 8.4% is not USPSTF's current position. No start age is stated; at 65 the row above applies.
for most patients, repeat BMD testing should be performed no sooner than 2 years
Our note: An excerpt: the sentence first suggests repeat screening for patients with initial results near treatment thresholds or with significant changes in risk factors, and ends "after initial screening". Grade as printed: "CONDITIONAL RECOMMENDATION, LOW-QUALITY EVIDENCE", weaker than ACOG's screening rows. ACOG notes that most screening guidelines give no guidance on retesting people with normal bone density and low fracture risk, and wants follow-up on the same DXA device.
The BHOF recommends screening densitometry in women aged ≥ 65 years
Our note: An excerpt from one sentence that covers all four BHOF rows on this page. The guide grades no recommendation. Its only every-2-years sentence sits under monitoring treatment response, about patients on treatment, so it is not a screening interval. Published April 28, 2022 in Osteoporosis International, BHOF's journal with the International Osteoporosis Foundation; a July 2022 correction changed no screening sentence. BHOF was formerly the National Osteoporosis Foundation.
men aged 70 years and older regardless of risk factors
Our note: From the guide's section on screening densitometry in men, which says BHOF and other societies recommend BMD testing in men, this group included, to inform treatment decisions. Ungraded. The guide calls these recommendations in concert with ISCD and Endocrine Society guidelines on osteoporosis in men; the Endocrine Society lists its 2012 men's guideline as retired, so it cannot be read as the Endocrine Society's current position. USPSTF (2025) finds the evidence insufficient for men.
younger postmenopausal women aged 50–64 years
Our note: An excerpt from BHOF's position sentence, which applies "with risk factors for osteoporosis" to this group; from 65 the women's row above applies. The guide's executive summary words the band differently: "Postmenopausal women and men aged 50–69 years, based on risk profile." BHOF names no tool or threshold: its Table 1 lists the conditions, diseases and medications that contribute to osteoporosis, and its Table 6 adds women in the menopausal transition. Ungraded.
men aged 50–69 years with clinical risk factors for fracture
Our note: From the guide's men's section; its position sentence words the same group "men aged 50-69 years with risk factors for osteoporosis". From 70 the men's row above applies. BHOF names no tool or threshold for these risk factors. Ungraded. USPSTF (2025) finds the evidence insufficient for men, and ACOG does not address them.
Why they differ
For women 65 and older the three bodies agree: scan. USPSTF grades it B and ACOG rates it strong on high-quality evidence; BHOF attaches no grade, because its guide uses no grading system. They part on three questions.
- Men. USPSTF (2025) finds the evidence insufficient; of the three screening trials it pooled, "The USPSTF found no studies that included men." BHOF (2022) recommends testing every man 70 and older and men 50 to 69 with risk factors. ACOG is silent: its guideline limits its evidence to studies of women. So for a man the page holds one graded statement of insufficient evidence and one ungraded recommendation to test. Weigh one detail: BHOF calls its men's recommendations in concert with the ISCD and Endocrine Society guidelines on osteoporosis in men, and the Endocrine Society now lists "Osteoporosis in Men (2012)" among its retired guidelines. BHOF's position is BHOF's own.
- Judging risk before 65. USPSTF's 2025 statement uses risk factors first, then a tool. Its Table 2 examples: OST, with a score under 2 frequently used as the threshold; ORAI, with 9 or higher; and FRAX, with no specific threshold. In its words: "For FRAX, there is no such threshold defined with respect to its use in screening." ACOG keeps the 2018 USPSTF wording, risk "as determined by a formal clinical risk assessment tool", and its text still restates the 2018 FRAX cutoff: a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk greater than 8.4%. The 2025 statement dropped that cutoff, so 8.4% is not USPSTF's current position. USPSTF says its 2025 FRAX example (a 10-year major fracture risk of 9.3% for a 65-year-old White woman with no risk factors) is not meant as a mechanistic threshold. BHOF says only "with risk factors", names no tool and starts its band at 50.
- When to repeat. USPSTF sets no interval: "Cohort studies evaluating screening intervals suggest that repeating BMD testing at an interval of 4 to 8 years does not result in additional accuracy in predicting fractures." It calls for more research. ACOG suggests a repeat scan when the first result was near a treatment threshold or risk factors changed significantly, with a floor of no sooner than 2 years for most patients; that is a conditional recommendation on low-quality evidence, weaker than its screening recommendations. BHOF states no screening interval. Its every-2-years sentence sits under monitoring treatment response, so it is about people already on treatment.
One caution applies to every body using FRAX. USPSTF: "Concerns exist regarding the validity of race-specific FRAX calculators." Decisions built on them with fixed thresholds, it warns, "may be less likely to identify Asian, Black, and Hispanic persons as high risk". ACOG adds that studies of DXA screening rates show "Black women are less likely to be screened for osteoporosis" than women in other racial and ethnic groups.
4 documents set the numbers on this page. The oldest was published in 2021, the newest in 2026.
- USPSTF recommendation
- ACOG recommendation
- Bone Health and Osteoporosis Foundation recommendation
- Clinical practice guidelines in development, with the Retired Guidelines list (page last updated July 17, 2026) 2026
We last re-read these sources on . How we verify.
What the test involves
Under 65, the risk check comes before the scan. ACOG's sequence is a clinical examination (medical history, physical examination, height measurement), a formal risk assessment tool, then BMD testing where age or the tool's result calls for it. BHOF says every postmenopausal woman and every man 50 or older should be evaluated for risk first, and that a scan is not indicated unless the result will change treatment or management. Height loss counts: ACOG reports the National Osteoporosis Foundation (now BHOF) recommendation that patients who have lost 1.5 inches (4 cm) or more from their peak height at age 20, or 0.8 inches (2 cm) or more from a previously documented measurement, should have vertebral imaging.
The scan measures the hip and lumbar spine, which ACOG calls the most accurate and precise sites; ACOG and BHOF both fall back to the forearm when those cannot be measured, for example after both hips are replaced or after lumbar spine surgery. BHOF describes the radiation as trivial, and USPSTF says central DXA "uses low doses of radiation." BHOF notes that DXA of the lumbar spine can be difficult to interpret accurately. For a repeat scan, ACOG and BHOF both want the same machine; ACOG's reason is that DXA machines differ and need consistent calibration.
The result is a T-score, read against the WHO classes in BHOF's Table 4: normal at -1.0 and above, low bone mass (osteopenia) between -1.0 and -2.5, and osteoporosis at or below -2.5. BHOF adds that these classes do not apply to premenopausal women, men under 50 or children, who cannot be diagnosed on bone density alone.
If the result is abnormal
A low result starts an evaluation, not an automatic prescription. USPSTF (2025): "To achieve the benefit of screening to reduce morbidity and mortality from fractures, women found to have osteoporosis should be further evaluated, counseled, and, if appropriate, prescribed evidence-based management." The drug therapies it lists as FDA-approved for treating or preventing osteoporosis are bisphosphonates, denosumab, romosozumab, parathyroid hormone, raloxifene, calcitonin, and estrogen with or without progesterone.
BHOF (2022) gives the points at which to consider drug treatment, for postmenopausal women and men 50 or older, to prevent a first fracture: a T-score of -2.5 or lower at the femoral neck, total hip, lumbar spine or 33% radius; or low bone mass, a T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 at the femoral neck or total hip, with a 10-year hip fracture risk of 3% or more or a 10-year major osteoporosis-related fracture risk of 20% or more on the US-adapted FRAX model. It says the thresholds "exist for guidance purposes only and are not absolute rules" and do not mandate treatment, particularly when bone mass is low but above the osteoporosis range, and that secondary causes of bone loss should be ruled out.
ACOG (2021, reaffirmed 2025) uses the same FRAX figures to define the disease. Its diagnostic criteria count any one of three as osteoporosis: a T-score of -2.5 or lower; a fragility fracture, including a vertebral fracture with no symptoms; or a T-score between -1.0 and -2.5 with increased fracture risk on a formal tool, which on US FRAX it puts at a 10-year hip fracture probability of 3% or greater or a major osteoporotic fracture probability of 20% or greater. So a scan read as osteopenia can still meet ACOG's definition of osteoporosis once fracture risk is counted, and an unexplained fragility fracture is diagnostic even with normal bone density. ACOG also says a tool such as FRAX can help decide on drug treatment in the osteopenia range, and that clinicians should assess fall risk in postmenopausal patients with low BMD or osteoporosis. ACOG covers treatment in a separate guideline, No. 2 (April 2022), which this page does not draw on.
More on this screening
Frequently asked questions
I am a man in my 70s. Should I have a bone density scan?
BHOF (2022) says yes: it recommends testing all men 70 and older regardless of risk factors. USPSTF (2025) says the evidence is insufficient to weigh benefits and harms in men, and that this is not a recommendation against screening; in its words, "clinicians and their patients should decide together whether to be screened." ACOG does not address men. If you have risk factors USPSTF lists for men, such as chronic corticosteroid use, a prior fracture, a fall in the past year, hypogonadism, smoking or excessive alcohol intake, bring them to that conversation.
I am 55 and postmenopausal. Do I need a DXA scan now?
Only if you are at increased risk, on all three positions. USPSTF's first step is a check for risk factors such as low body weight, a parent who broke a hip, smoking and excess alcohol; with 1 or more, a risk tool decides whether a scan is warranted. ACOG requires a formal risk tool for everyone under 65. BHOF recommends testing women 50 to 64 with risk factors. Without increased risk, all three put the routine scan at 65.
My FRAX score is above 8.4%. Does USPSTF say I need a scan?
Not by that number alone. ACOG's 2021 guideline, describing USPSTF's 2018 statement, puts the cutoff at a 10-year major osteoporotic fracture risk greater than 8.4%. USPSTF's January 2025 statement sets no FRAX threshold for screening. It gives a 9.3% example for a 65-year-old White woman with a BMI of 25 and no risk factors, and says that figure is not meant as a mechanistic threshold. Your FRAX result is one input your clinician uses to decide whether a scan is warranted, not a rule on its own.
How often should I repeat the scan?
No body on this page sets a fixed screening schedule. USPSTF (2025) reports that in cohort studies, repeating the scan at 4 to 8 years added no accuracy in predicting fractures, and calls for more research. ACOG suggests a repeat when the first result was near a treatment threshold or your risk factors changed, and for most patients no sooner than 2 years after the first scan. BHOF's every-2-years advice is for monitoring people on treatment. Have any repeat done on the same machine; ACOG and BHOF both ask for that.
My T-score is -1.8. Do I have osteoporosis?
On the T-score alone, no: BHOF's table puts -1.0 to -2.5 in the low bone mass (osteopenia) range and osteoporosis at -2.5 or lower. But ACOG's diagnostic criteria also count a T-score in that range as osteoporosis when a formal tool shows high fracture risk, which on US FRAX means a 10-year hip fracture probability of 3% or more or a major osteoporotic fracture probability of 20% or more. BHOF uses the same two figures as the point to consider drug treatment. Ask for your FRAX result alongside the T-score.